Archive for the ‘Guest Blogger’ Category

Live from Marlborough, part two

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

(Guest blogger:  Michael Raugh)

Friday night at the annual NGH convention is always show night.  Three stage hypnotists put on shows for the entertainment of the attendees and their guests.  This year the performers were Tommy Vee, Nadeen the self-styled “Queen of Hypnosis,” and Dan LaRosa.  Tommy Vee and Dan LaRosa were both well-known performers that I’d seen before, so my group (myself, Julie, and two of my sons) got tickets for Nadeen, the 8:30 show.

The show was interesting.  Nadeen was clearly nervous, as I think anyone would be with people like Dr. Dwight Damon and Jerry Valley in the audience along with some 450 other hypnotists and their guests.  Her format was something I’ve never seen done before:  a tribute show.  Nadeen borrowed routines from several famous stage performers past and present such as the late Ormond McGill, Tom Silver, and Jerry Valley (gutsy with Jerry in the audience), gave a short introduction to each discussing the original hypnotist, and then performed the routines in her own style with a nod to the originator.   I won’t say that the performance lived up to the “Queen of Hypnosis” tag but it was certainly one of the more memorable shows I’ve seen lately.

After being up late socializing it was hard to get moving for an 8am session on Saturday, but somehow I managed it.  And I was glad, because the session I’d chosen was Communicating Under Pressure by Faith Wood.  Faith has a smooth, dynamic style that is easy to listen to and a great sense of humor.  The session focused on communication skills when either you or the person you are seeking to communicate with is under emotional pressure.  Real-life examples and Faith’s style made this a very pleasant and informative hour — just what I needed to start the day.

Next I moved on to another session I picked because I know, like, and respect the presenter:  William Mitchell’s How to Make Posthypnotic Suggestions Stick.  William gave lots of practical advice backed up with examples from his practice, including a recorded interview with a smoking cessation client in which she talked about being surprised by the effects of some of the posthypnotic suggestions he’d given her.

After that came a two-hour paid seminar that I’d chosen from Scott McFall called Inductions of the Masters.  Scott comes off as something of a renegade and seems to enjoy it that way.  His style is to throw out a statement intended to challenge the audience’s beliefs (for example:  “People have all kinds of misconceptions about hypnosis.  Don’t mess with that — we spent hundreds of years creating them!”) and then back it up with evidence or experiential stories to prove his point.  It made for a fun and fascinating two hours, in which Scott called out specific qualities or statements of legendary hypnotists and discussed why they worked so well.

After a lunch break I had two more sessions to attend.  Wil Horton’s Inside Secrets of Elite Trainers contained insights into making more memorable, interesting training presentations and was well worth the time to attend.

The highlight of the day, though, was my last session:  Hypnotist, Hypnotize Thyself! with Gloria Constantas.  I have a lot of admiration for Gloria because she always challenges me to think differently and to really examine what I believe and why.  This session took the concepts from her Verbal Impact presentation that I’d attended in 2007 and advanced them a step farther into a discussion of how we as hypnotists can — and should — be helping ourselves through our own self-talk and the use of the basic principles of self-hypnosis.  It was a pleasure to be in Gloria’s audience again.

Tonight most of the attendees will be taking part in the formal banquet and awards presentation.  Not me; Julie and I are due for some together time.  I’ll do a wrap-up installment tomorrow when the conference is over.

<MR>

Live from Marlborough, part one

Friday, August 7th, 2009

(Guest blogger: Michael Raugh)

Yes, it’s been a long dry spell at The Transparent Hypnotist.  Things have been quite busy, personally and professionally, for both Ellie and me.  Ellie was not able to make the NGH convention this year, so I thought I’d post a few reports while I’m here for the benefit of those who aren’t here.

This year’s theme is “Join the Leaders.”  I’ll have to ask some people who saw Dr. Damon’s keynote for highlights because I missed it.  (Why do they schedule it for 8am Friday, anyway?)   My session choices this year are a mixture of basic skills, marketing (a major weakness of mine), and things that either look like fun or feature presenters I admire and enjoy.

The day started with a session on Abreactions given by Marx Howell.  Marx’s field is forensic hypnosis rather than therapy, so his approach to the subject is quite different from what I’m used to seeing presented.  Often in therapy we seek to cause an abreaction as part of the process of resolving inner conflict; Marx works exclusively with victims and witnesses to violent crime, though, and as a result is more focused on protecting the client from that emotional trauma while eliciting information reliably.  He had a lot of good points on how to avoid an abreaction if that’s the goal.

Next up was Marilyn Gordon’s session on Hypnosis And The Internet.  I have to say this was a disappointment to me.  Marilyn is very well known and respected within NGH, but it became painfully obvious early on that she was presenting on a topic that she barely understands herself.  Gloria Constantas was sitting with me in that session and got to see me wince repeatedly as Marilyn tossed out inaccurate web terminology and asserted that “right-brained” people have a hard time understanding tech.  I would attend another Marilyn Gordon seminar without hesitation, but not if the topic is in any way related to technology.

Next came play time:  Joann Abrahamsen’s session called Gimmicks, Gizmos and Gadgets.  Several years ago I took a similar session, then given by Laura Amoroso, and it was so much fun that I wanted to see Joann’s take on it.  She brought out a suitcase full of various toys and demonstrated how they can be used as induction props.  Several were simply novel eye fixation objects, including a plastic ‘magic wand’ with a flashing pink star at the tip and an hourglass.  Joann also demonstrated an auditory induction using a pair of Chinese singing balls and a kinesthetic induction using a pair of soft, squishy stress balls.  It was a nice way to close out the morning.

After lunch I have Joann Abrahamsen again for a three-hour paid workshop all about inductions.  Admittedly this falls squarely under “fun” on my selection criteria, but every hypnotist knows that while we may have a couple of go-to inductions that we tend to use the most it’s always good to experiment with more.  A hypnotist who knows, and can confidently use, a wide range of induction techniques is more versatile and therefore better prepared for that eventual client who just needs something a bit different for the best experience.

More as it happens.

<MR>

Hypnotism News Monday

Monday, June 29th, 2009

(guest posted by Michael Raugh)

Morning, everyone.   It’s been way too long since we had a Monday news round-up.  Part of the reason, I’ll confess, is that I haven’t found much to include.  Ellie is much better at finding these things than I am.  Still, here’s what a bit of Googling turned up.

From naturalnews.com comes a short piece by Steve G. Jones that touches on how researchers use hypnosis to study how the brain responds to different stimuli.  His sources are all pretty old and the piece is vague, but at least it’s possible and factual.

A piece on WebMD last week talks about a recent University of Geneva study on paralysis that looks interesting.  A dozen volunteers were hypnotized and givent he suggestion that their left hand would be paralyzed and then, while hooked up to a functional MRI, told to move that hand.  Those results were then compared to a control group who were not hypnotized but instead told to fake the paralysis.

A press release from the weekend announced that Jeffrey H. Cohen received the Humanitarian Award from the IACT/IMDHA at their May convention in Florida.  IMDHA has seriously upgraded its image, in my estimation anyway, since merging with IACT and coming under the guidance of the likes of Robert Otto and Wendi Friesen.

Did you notice anything that I missed?  Leave a comment and let everyone know.

<MR>

Almost time again

Friday, June 12th, 2009

As I write this it’s just a touch under two months until the annual National Guild of Hypnotists Convention.

I spent some time recently looking over the convention catalog, which is posted on the convention page of the NGH website.  A few of the one-hour seminars caught my attention and I thought, in the absence of a Friday 10 Questions, I’d draw some attention to them for the benefit of those who plan to attent (or who are maybe trying to decide).

  • Marx Howell will be doing a lecture on regression techniques with an eye toward avoiding traumatic abreactions.  Marx’s experience with forensic hypnosis (using hypnosis with crime victims) makes him an expert on that and I know from past seminars that Marx is an outstanding presenter, so I’m looking forward to this.
  • Joann Abrahamsen is on the schedule with her annual “Gimmicks, Gizmos and Gadgets” presentation.  I love this seminar!  Every year Joann shares the latest in toys and gadgets she’s discovered that, whether intentionally or not, can be used very effectively as hypnosis props.
  • Bernard Yam will be exploring the scientific side of hypnotism, discussing FMRI technology and its implications to how we view … well, everything.  I attended his seminars last year and enjoyed them both.
  • My favorite presenter of all time, Gloria Constantas, presents “Hypnotist, Hypnotize Thyself!” about using hypnosis on ourselves.  This will be an absolute must see.
  • These two really surprised me:  Philip Holder is holding a seminar Friday called “Put the Pizzazz Back In Your Sex Life” in which, according to the blurb, he will discuss using hypnosis to help with better and more satisfying sex.  Then on Sunday, Sharon Stidham presents “Not Tonight — I Love You, But I Have a Headache — Zen & The Art Of Middle Aged Sex” which pretty much says it all right there. Anything remotely about sex has been taboo with NGH for years, so I hope there is a strong turnout for these.

Mind you, those are just a few picks that jumped out at me from approaching two hundred possibilities.  There was also the usual contingent of things that strike me, at least up front, as of dubious value or credibility.  Hypnosis to cure allergies?  There are seminars on past life regression, on whether or not to believe in PLR, and now there’s one on “Lives Between Lives” — which seems to say that there are lifes in between the past lives!  I’m a pragmatist when it comes to that sort of thing, but I’m sure they will be well attended.

And of course it wouldn’t be an NGH convention if there wasn’t also a collection of old stand-bys:  morning yoga and chi kung, seminars on how to conduct seminars, and of course “How To Prepare A Winning Convention Proposal.”

Since I’ll probably be busy this weekend and may not get a Sunday Question posted, let’s close with one:  Are you planning to attend the NGH Convention in August?  What seminars do you plan to attend?

<MR>

Pain and Recovery

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009
Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA (from their website)

Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA (from their website)

(Guest poster:  Michael Raugh)

Good morning.

First things first:  Ellie is okay.  She’s run into a serious time crunch because of some of the changes she alluded to in her real-world life, and that’s what has kept her from the blog.  When she returns I’m sure she’ll share as much of the story as she can.

My sweetheart, Julie, had day surgery recently at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, which involved a different sort of pain than Ellie’s.  Often as a hypnotist I feel a little out of place in a medical facility.  So many real doctors tend to see hypnotists, especially “lay hypnotists” like myself, as a nuisance at best or charlatans at worst.  The staff at Newton-Wellesley gave me none of that vibe, I rush to say.  They are delightful people and made us feel very comfortable.

In the 19th century James Braid performed hundreds of amputations and other surgeries using only hypnosis for anesthesia.  A number of modern hospitals welcome hypnosis in childbirth (talk to my friend Dee Bitner about that) but it’s not often seen in other forms of surgery.  And Julie was no exception.  She is capable of reaching very deep trance states up to and including the Esdaile state, so in theory she could have had her procedure that way, but there’s a time and a place for experiments and this wasn’t it.

We did make ample use of hypnosis both before and after the procedure, though.  Before, for example, I put Julie in a moderate trance to help her remain relaxed and distracted while the nurse tried twice to establish a good IV and then had to yield to the anesthesiologist because Julie’s veins were hard to pin down.   The nurse commented on how soothing my voice was.

After the procedure Julie was in a fair amount of pain despite the medications still in her system.  We worked on that and were able to  lessen the pain somewhat, but the narcotics interfered with her concentration.  It wasn’t until that evening when she could focus well enough to really take control of her body’s responses again.  I’m proud of my honey, though, because she made it through the next few days needing nothing but hypnosis and a little Advil to keep herself comfortable.  As a result she felt good enough that we spent Memorial Day weekend out and about, within reasonable limits, and that helped us both feel worlds better.

<MR>

Another Day for David

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

It has been on again off again with accessing the Internet and as late as I was with yesterday’s posting, I wrote this in hope that you read (or re-read) David’s post from yesterday.

And do come back tomorrow for the 10 questions. Rock and roll, baby. On Saturday we will have some esoteric thoughts from Terry with HypnoMedia.

10 Steps to Happiness by David Mason

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009


Photograph by Pensiero (cc)

As I travel the back roads, lost sites, and in general follow my bliss, today seems like a supreme day to feature guest poster David Mason’s 10 Steps to Happiness. I hope you enjoy them!!!!

The 10 Steps to Happiness

This list is the outcome of interviews with thousands of happy people, people who are able to put a smile on their face every day. The research was done in the UK trying to find what it is that makes people happy, what happy people have in common. The results are simple and surprising. Do each of these every day and you are on your way to making yourself and those around you feel better all the time.

1. Plant something and nurture it.
    Taking care of something living, something undemanding that grows and changes is a way of rewarding yourself with progress. It can be a plant or a pet, anything that you can nurture. Even a goldfish can put you back in touch with nature.
2. Count your blessings - at least five - at the end of each day.
    Go over all the good things that happened today, reminding yourself of all the little things can make you feel good. If you feel life is getting on top of you, write them down each night, and then look them over at the end of the week. You will surprised at how many good things happen to you.
3. Make time to talk - have an hour-long conversation with a loved one each week.
    It doesn’t matter what you talk about, just make sure you get your weekly appointment with someone close. Someone you can talk about how you feel, what you want, and really listen to each other.
4. Phone a friend you haven’t spoken to for a while and arrange to meet up.
    Happiness thrives on human interaction. Keep your contacts alive by regularly sending a text, or email them something interesting you saw on the Internet, or just call to say hello. Before television invaded our homes, visiting other people was the main social activity. Get into the habit of having a coffee with someone, or go shopping together, anything that reinforces your friendship.
5. Give yourself a treat every day and take the time to really enjoy it.
    Make sure you put a little bit of joy into every day. No matter how stressed you are, or how busy you are, you can always plan some little pleasure. Even if it is just a cup of tea while you look out of the window, or a few minutes to yourself in a busy day. You deserve a treat.
6. Have a good laugh at least once a day
    Laughter is the best medicine. Go out and have fun. Tune in to a comedy or read a few pages of a light hearted book.
7. Get physical - exercise for half an hour three times a week
    Physical exercise keeps you healthy, but also makes you happy. Go for a walk with the family after dinner, or leave the car three blocks away and walk to work, join a dance class. It is easy to put some exercise into your daily routines.
8. Smile at and/or say hello to a stranger at least once each day
    Practice smiling at people as you walk along the street - you will be surprised at how many smile back. Say hello the moment you enter a lift, you can make a new friend. Modern society has separated people, even a little encouragement can go a long way towards building social networks.
9. Cut your TV viewing by half .
    TV viewing is essentially solitary and prevents people from doing other things. Much of TV is good, but it can become a default behaviour and grow to dominate free time. Dare to turn it off for a night.
10. Spread some kindness - do a good turn for someone every day
    Giving other people a little pleasure means you get a good feeling too. Why not contribute a little to that feeling of community by making someone else’s day? You never know, it might be your turn tomorrow.

Esoteric Characters: The Enchantress

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

amora3b
Hypnomedia’s Terry O’Brien brings us another fascinating Esoteric Saturday.

Looking over the diverse cast of mesmeric characters in the Golden Age of Comics (which is the period from the start of comics publication through the end of WW II) one is eventually struck by the rampant sexism involved. Practically every villainous hypnotic character is male, from the shady sideshow hypnotists and crafty con artists to the mysterious mystics and malevolent magicians to the sinister scientists and demented doctors. Which should be no surprise, as there were very few female villains at all during that time. The most famous female hero of the time, Wonder Woman. Wonder Woman had several female opponents, but her two hypnotic opponents, one female and one male, both disguised themselves: the female one was Hypnota, the self-described “?agician of the Blue Ray” and member of “Villainy, Incorporated”, who disguised herself as a man using a fake mustache and goatee, while the requisite male hypnotic villain was Dr Psycho, who hypnotized a subservient female spirit medium to evoke and manipulate ectoplasm at his command, including disguising his dwarfish body with a handsome ectoplasmic shell.

There were a few others, of curse, such as the Harlequin, who used a pair of hypnotic glasses as part of her circus clown motif, but she was a much more sympathetic character and eventually reformed, and Baroness von Gunther, another of Wonder Woman’s opponents, who on at least one occasion tried using hypnosis to interrogate a captive office (which ultimately failed, again possibly demonstrating male superiority.) But these were quite the exceptions: it almost seems as though the comics writers just didn’t want to or weren’t allowed to have a female character, hero or villain, who could control the male characters. It was acceptable for Luthor to put Superman under his hypnotic control, but no woman could. Given the sexism of the culture at the time, that seems a likely explanation.

But that all changed at the dawn of the Silver Age of Comics (starting around 1964), which happened to roughly coincide with the dawn of the Women’s Movement. Strong female characters like Saturn Girl of the Legion of Super-Heroes and Sue Storm (the Invisible Girl, later the Invisible Woman) started appearing, so it was fitting that it also see saw the dawn of the first true female hypnotic villainous characters.

And what a dawn it was.

Enter the Enchantress. A minor Asgardian goddess (it has been suggested she was based on Freya, although later suggestions are that she was Idunn) she long lusted after the noble Thor, all the way from when they were young godlings, all to naught, as Thor was either too interested in battling giants or in his battle companion Sif (a purely potentially Platonic relationship) whereas Amora, to use her given name, was more interested in pleasure and the satisfaction of her amorous desires. During that time, she made several suspected and one certain attempt to enthrall Thor but was constantly thwarted, either by Sif or her own misjudgment about Thor himself. That never stopped her, however.

The Enchantress possessed the average abilities of any Asgardian god or goddess, strengths and abilities far above mere mortal men and women, but it was her superior seductive skills and mesmerizing mystic abilities that truly earned her the title of the Enchantress. She was an apt magical pupil of Karnilla, Queen of the Norns (who had her own unrequited passion for another of the Norse gods, Balder) until Karnilla banished her, and she used her wiles and magical ways to seduce and learn from other instructors. She used her supernatural beauty as a weapon as powerful as any repulsor ray or mystic hammer, and employed her mystic learning to devastating ends. She excelled at spells of enchantments and illusions, going so far as enchanting her lips so that any man she kissed (which even included the Vision, an android) into falling deeply in love with her. She had several other mystic charms and enchantments and artifacts in her arsenal, as well.

374px-enchantress_by_jack_Visually, the Enchantress lived up to her name and reputation. A tall, green-eyed blonde with long flowing hair and longer legs (there is one memorable image of her, by an artist with demonstratively limited knowledge of human proportion, which showed her with legs twice the size of her body: the image was derisively titled “Stilt Girl”) she is one of the best examples of artist Jack Kirby’s women, and subsequent artists have also done her justice.

The Enchantress first appeared in “Journey into Mystery” (1964) in a plot by Loki: her mission was to seduce Don Blake, Thor’s mortal alter-ego. Her supernatural beauty allowed her to manipulate the mortal populace of New York, but Thor’s own supernatural heritage and noble love for Sif allowed him to resist even her charms. For this and other crimes, the Enchantress and her cohort the Executioner were banished to Earth by an angry Odin (Avengers #7), where they set about contacting like-minded criminal individuals, eventually forming an alliance with Baron Zemo and creating the Masters of Evil. In their first scheme to battle the Avengers, the Enchantress summoned Thor by way of a haunting call, then momentarily mesmerized him with a hypnotic stare and placed him under her control using a powerful potion. Under her control, he saw his fellow Avengers as cruel enemies and started attacking them. Fortunately Iron Man realized Thor was under a hypnotic spell and managed to awaken him with a bright flash of light.

That set the pattern for the Enchantress. Her plots typically involved some scheme to gain control over Thor or some way to further her satisfactions. She would target Thor or any other male hero with her mesmerizing beauty and hypnotic spells, including such heroes as Captain America, the Black Knight and the Vision, if she thought she could gain something from the encounter. However, she was more vain and self-centered as opposed to actually villainous, so very little actual damage was ever done. She avoided confrontations with female heroes, but she did have battles with the Scarlet Witch (once the wife of the Vision) and Clea, the paramour of Doctor Strange.

That pattern began to change when Lorelei, Amora’s younger sister, showed up. Lorelei did what Amora never could, managing to snare Thor’s heart, although she had to use a mystic love potion and the aid of Loki to do so. A jealous Amora helped free Thor and take her vengeance against her sister by causing Lorelei to fall in love with Loki by way of the same mystic potion. When Thor discovered them together in bed, he was so enraged at their duplicity and at how he had been enchanted: that he forced Loki to free him from the mystic love spell by threatening him with certain death and Loki could only comply.

Its hard to say whether that event, the later death of Lorelei, or other factors effected a change in her character, but it did lead to a change in her relationship with Thor. When Odin removed Thor’s powers and banished him to Earth, he and Amora finally had the relationship she desired, living together in New York, but it didn’t last, as Thor suddenly went missing (as did many other heroes at the time.) When Thor later returned to Asgard to return the missing Odin to the throne, then assumed the throne himself, he and Amora continued that relationship. But all that ended when Loki initiated Ragnarok and destroyed Asgard and the Asgardians. Yet gods do not die so easily, so long as mortal men remember them: Thor eventually awoke and returned to the mortal world. When he was manipulated by Loki into awakening the rest of the other Asgardians, it included Amora, who is now hanging with the Young Masters.

Its hard to imagine a character like the Enchantress as a model for the Woman’s Movement, but in many ways she was. Certainly she was vain and self-centered but she was also strong and independent, allying herself and using others but never subservient to them, more often at least their equal if not superior to them. She used her own talents and beauty to make her own way in the world and was totally unapologetic about it. She had the will and the drive to excel at her chosen endeavor, plus the patience to see her through any setback. But underneath her manipulative exterior, she still had a heart. The other man in her life, Skurge, the Executioner, was infatuated with her but rarely assisted her schemes unless they were directly related to Thor or Asgard. For her part, Amora heartlessly strung him along. But when he sacrificed himself in a raid on Hel, she found herself truly grieving for his loss.

In short, Amora is a ground-breaker and a trend-setter, a complicated character and a true enchantress. And a fitting icon of the Women’s Movement that she sprung from.

The Hypknowsis.com Affirmation Method

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

by Dave Mason, PhD © 2009

Affirmations are simple and powerful, but finding the right affirmation can be difficult. This article describes a procedure for automatically creating affirmations that will have just the right words, and are guaranteed to align with your goals.

Preparation

Set aside some time, about fifteen or twenty minutes.

You will need paper and something to write with.

Spend some quiet time thinking about yourself and your situation and what it is that you want to change about yourself.

Write down how you feel

Then take the pen and paper and start writing lots of short sentences starting with ‘I’. For example ‘I am…’, ‘I feel..’, ‘ I want…’, ‘I need…’, ‘I think….’ . Use actual paper, not a word processor. The act of physically writing and forming the shapes engages your brain differently. Write on one side of the paper only. Just let the words flow. Do as  many as you can as fast as you can. Don’t think about the exact words, don’t agonise over whether it is right or wrong or whether it is original or anything else. Just write. And keep writing for about ten minutes or until nothing new is coming out. Look over what you have written, and if anything else occurs to you, write that down as a sentence.

Create the strips

When you are done, cut or tear the paper into strips so that each sentence is on its own bit of paper.

Throw away any sentences that are facts like ‘ I am five feet tall’ or ‘I need to lose weight’. Throw away any sentences that you can’t do anything about, for example ‘I didn’t do well at school’ or ‘I need more time‘. Only keep the ones that are about feelings, attitudes, beliefs.

Sort the strips into piles

Now mix all the strips up and pull them out one at a time and put them into piles that relate to the same thing. Some strips might belong in several piles. That is OK. Write out a copy of the original sentence and put the copies into as many piles as needed.

Sort though  each pile, there might be lots of strips or there might be only one or two. It doesn’t matter. There is no right number. Now get a fresh bit of paper and write a label for each pile, and label it with what it is about. Just sit back and become aware of any relationship between the labels. You might find you need to rewrite the labels several times. You might want to rearrange the piles.

Separate the strips

Now, take each pile and sort the strips into positive and negative. Notice whether any are contradictory, they show that you have a conflict about the subject. Read each negative strip aloud, and challenge the idea. Ask yourself, ‘How do I know this is true?, How would I prove to someone else that this sentence is true?’ Think about the sentence, and think about what you would advise someone else who said that, how you would get them to change, and what they would do.

Balance all the negative strips

Match up every negative strip with a positive strip. If there is no positive strip, then create one. Write a sentence that is the opposite of the negative one. Say it aloud. Repeat it and change it until it sounds just right.

Do that for each pile. You will probably find that your attitude to each pile changes and you might need to relabel the piles.

Write down you goals

When you have done every pile, get some more paper and create five bigger labels. These bigger labels are for listing your goals.

Write one of  the words ‘Financial, Health, Self Improvement, Relationships, Community’ on a label. Now spend some time thinking about what you want for each goal, and write down some things you will have achieved in one year, and in five years. Only write three to five things for each goal. You can spend some deciding what you want and you can go back and change them as many times as you want. When you are happy that the things you have listed are what you really want, and are possible to get,  write out a clean copy of your goals.

Find where the energy is  for your goals

Now put the goal labels next to the piles of strips, and move them around and feel what piles will help to achieve that goal. Focus on finding the most powerful goal and pile combination. You might have to create some more positive strips.

Get rid of the negative strips

When you have got the arrangement the way you want, take away all the negative strips. Look at each one and imagine how you would like to get rid of it. You can actually burn them, or flush them down the toilet, whatever you feel is best.

Start focussing on your goals

The next step is to start getting those goals. You are going to put those goal labels in places where you will come upon them unexpectedly. Put one in the cutlery drawer so you see it the next time to go to get a spoon. Put one on the bathroom mirror. Put one on the driving seat of the car. Keep moving them around so they pop up and make you take notice. If you go out for example, throw one on the floor without looking, so it will surprise you when you come back. Then pick it up and read your goals again, and ask ‘What have I done today towards that goal?’. ‘What could I have done?’ and resolve to do it.

Start using your affirmations

What you have left is the positive strips. These are your affirmations. By going through this process every affirmation is linked to a goal. You need to find a way of going over these affirmations daily. What to do is to select a few of the strips each day and put them in your pocket, or on your desktop, and whenever you have a moment, take one out and say your positive affirmation out loud. You can select one when waiting for the traffic lights, or the next time you look at the clock, or any other time. Get into the habit of pulling one at random, saying the sentence and thinking about it leading to your goal. The constant repetition and the focus on what you want will make it all come true sooner than you ever dreamed possible.


Note from Ellie

I will be doing this as a project on The Unwinding Path on Monday, March 2. I hope you will join me. Also, please leave some feedback on this process as David would appreciate it.

Esoteric Saturday: Jane Annie

Saturday, February 21st, 2009

by Terry O’Brien

janean01

Given the people behind it, it should have been a raging success.

It wasn’t.

“Jane Annie, or The Good Conduct Prize” was an opera written by J M Barrie (of “Peter Pan” fame) and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (of Sherlock Holmes fame) with music by Ernest Ford, for the Savoy Theatre by Richard D’Oyly Carte.

Several years before he wrote “Peter Pan”, J M Barrie was a prominent journalist and novelist with one successful stage production to his credit. He conceived of the opera “Jane Annie” and brought the concept to Richard D’Oyly Carte. At that time, Carte and his theater were suffering because of the dissolution of the famous team of Gilbert & Sullivan several years earlier, and he was looking for material to replace the popular duo. Carte suggested having Arthur Sullivan collaborate but Barrie wanted his former pupil Ernest Ford. Unfortunately, however, in 1893, Barrie suffered from bronchitis which led to the first of his series of nervous breakdowns and was unable to complete the project. Barrie asked his friend Doyle to help, which was a good idea insofar as Doyle was the hottest literary property of the time since creating Sherlock Holmes only six years previously. By the time Doyle began work on the libretto, the shape of the play had already been determined and he was unable to correct what he saw as serious problems. Doyle himself said “Ideas and wit were there in abundance. But the plot itself was not strong, although the dialogue and the situations also were occasionally excellent. I did my best and wrote the lyrics for the second act, and much of the dialogue, but it had to take the predestined shape.” When Barrie recovered, he and Doyle argued and repeatedly changed the script, so much so that the actors were still apprehensive up to opening night and beyond.

The title character, Jane Annie, is a brat in adult form in school. Her goal in the first act is to win the Good Conduct Award by informing on the plans of her friend Bab to elope. Then, at the beginning of the second act, she explains herself: as a small child, she discovered that she could make people do whatever she willed by hypnotizing them.

SONG. ­ JANE ANNIE.
When I was a little piccaninny,
Only about _so_ high,
I’d a baby’s bib and a baby’s pinny
And a queer little gimlet eye.
They couldn’t tell why that tiny eye
Would make them writhe and twist,
They found it so, but how could they know
That the babe was a hypnotist?

ALL.
Now think of that! this tiny bray
Was a bit of a hypnotist!

JANE A.
And as I grew my power grew too,
For we were one, you see,
And what I willed the folk would do
At a wave or a glance from me.
I could “suggest” what pleased me best,
And still can, when I list,
And Madam Card will find it hard
To beat this hypnotist!

ALL.
Oh, think of it! This little chit
Is a mighty mesmerist!

This very stereotypical use of hypnosis is accomplished through her almost instantaneous inductions and are accomplished by hypnotic gestures and passes (such stereotypical actions are very much in line with Victorian times.) She uses her abilities to command the affections of the man she fancies, as well as being matchmaker when her best friend Bab is conflicted between two possible suitors, Jack the military officer or Tom the press student: Jane Annie takes the practical course and hypnotically takes Jack for herself and hypnotizes Bab and Tom into accepting each other. Any possible obstruction by the members of the faculty at the school are quickly dismissed with a hypnotic wave of her hand, and the two couples exit to a rousing chorus exclaiming her hypnotic prowess.

CHORUS.

Hyp-hyp-hyp-notize!
Another!
Hyp-hyp-hypnotize!
One more!
Hyp-hyp-hypnotize!

Its hard to believe that the lead character was supposed to have this hypnotic power: it doesn’t appear at all in the first act yet is the main focus of the character in the second act. The reason, I think, is because of Doyle’s involvement. Barrie, as far as I can tell, had no interest in hypnotism, nor are there any appearances of such in his writings, whereas Doyle was actively involved in Spiritualism and mediums and so it is not a far stretch to believe hypnotism was also one of his interests, as hypnosis is mentioned in the Sherlock Holmes story ‘The Case of the Illustrious Client’ in conjunction with the way a sinister individual has taken control of a young heiress but it is never shown or demonstrated, and is more explicitly used in two other non-Holmes short stories. However, one of Barrie’s biographers surmises that while the hypnosis scenes sprung from Doyle’s mind, hypnotism is such a major moving force of the second act that Barrie must have conceived it and made it part of the scenario available to Doyle that he apparently couldn’t correct. I think Doyle was stuck with a scenario where he had to explain the way the lead character was able to get away with what she did and decided to use hypnosis as the rationale.

It is, however, safe to assume that both writers were at least conscious about hypnosis as more than just a literary device. Hypnosis was a very popular topic of research and demonstration among the upper-class of Victorian England of the period, of which both authors were members. Among its practitioners were such fellow writers as Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins (author of “The Moonstone”: one of the earliest mystery writers, creator of the final exposition scene by the investigating detective and a writer who made use of hypnotic elements in his stories.) Demonstrations of a wide range of hypnotic phenomena, including mediumship, were common. (These demonstrations, I believe, also strongly influenced the origin of the practice of stage hypnosis.)

However, such demonstrations were typically and probably exclusively in terms of the Victorian culture, with a dominant upper-class man hypnotizing a lower-class woman, usually a servant, using her as the object (or perhaps the term “subject” would be more appropriate) for the demonstration. Some of these women became well-known and achieved a certain level of fame in their own right, but the class boundaries were always present. That’s what makes “Jane Annie” so striking: the lead character is so completely at odds not only with the pattern described above, she is so completely at odds with the accepted role for women in Victorian society, being a self-centered dominant woman hypnotist of rather uncertain social standing and a social climber of the most aggressive sort. This could only happen because this was intended as a comic opera. (It would be an interesting investigation to see whether this was a common theme in Victorian productions.)

The opera was the theater’s first flop: critics hated it. After the first performance, Ford was applauded for his music but the authors were not even accorded the accepted custom of being asked out on stage. George Bernard Shaw reviewed it and said it was, “the most unblushing outburst of tomfoolery that two responsible citizens could conceivably indulge in publicly.” Doyle and Barrie made 4 revisions of the libretto, an unlikely number given the relatively short run. Ultimately, even Barrie was embarrassed and disappointed with it. However, one positive result was that Doyle and Barrie remained good friends, and the failure of the opera did little to stop their literary successes. Barrie even wrote a spoof of the situation entitled “The Adventure of the Two Collaborators” in which the collaborators approach Holmes and Watson to discover why no one was attending their opera.

The production ran for 50 performances in London from May 13, 1893 through July 1, 1893. It then went on tour until August 26. “Jane Annie” has been rarely performed since and is largely forgotten to this day, remembered only for its Barrie and Doyle connections, as well as its collateral connection with Gilbert & Sullivan.


The enclosed image is from a newspaper review of the performance. I have to thank Cliff Coles, a contributor to the Gilbert & Sullivan Archives, for providing me with the image.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Annie
http://math.boisestate.edu/GaS/other_savoy/jane_annie/jane_annie_home.html


ss_blog_claim=eb711211af0b087d785c1e8cbf6e716a